University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (2nd Amendment), Regulations, 2013

University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of

Standards in Higher Education) (2nd Amendment), Regulations, 2013

 

To be published in the Gazette of India

Part III Sector 4

 

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION

BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG

NEW DELHI-110002

No.F.1-2/2009 (EC/PS) V (i) Vol-II                                                                                                                               13th June, 2013

 

In exercise of the powers conferred under clause (e) and (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 26 of University Grants Commission Act, 1956 (3 of 1956), the University Grants Commission hereby frames the following amendment Regulations, namely:-

 

1. Short title, application and commencement:

1.1. These Regulations may be called the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (2nd Amendment), Regulations, 2013.

1.2 They shall come into force with immediate effect from their publication in the Official Gazette.

 

2. The clause 6.1.0 of the Annexure of University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations, 2010 (hereinafter to be called ‘The Principal Regulations’) shall stand amended and be substituted by the following clause:-

“6.1.0 ‘The overall selection procedure shall incorporate transparent, objective and credible methodology of analysis of the merits and credentials of the applicants based on weightages given to the performance of the candidate in different relevant dimensions and his/her performance on a scoring system proforma, based on the Academic Performance Indicators (API) as provided in this Regulations in Tables I to IX of Appendix III.

Provided that API scores will be used for screening purpose only and will have no bearing on expert assessment of candidates in Direct Recruitment/ CAS

Provided also that the API score claim of each of the sub-categories in the Category III (Research and Publications and Academic Contributions) will have the following cap to calculate the total API score claim for Direct Recruitment / CAS

Sub-Category

Cap as % of API cumulative score

in application

III (A) : Research papers (Journals, etc)

30%

III (B) Research publications (Books, etc)

25%

III (C) Research Projects

20%

III (D) Research Guidance

10%

III (E) Training Courses and Conference /Seminar, etc

15%

 

In order to make the system more credible, universities may assess the ability for teaching and/or research aptitude through a seminar or lecture in a class room situation or discussion on the capacity to use latest technology in teaching and research at the interview stage. These procedures can be followed for both direct recruitment and CAS promotions wherever selection committees are prescribed in these Regulations.”

 

3. The clause 6.0.2 of the Principal Regulations shall stand amended and be substituted by the following clause:-

“6.0.2The Universities shall adopt these Regulations for selection committees and selection procedures through their respective statutory bodies incorporating the Academic Performance Indicator (API) based Performance Based Appraisal System (PBAS) at the institutional level for University Departments and their Constituent colleges/ affiliated colleges (Government/Government-aided/Autonomous/ Private Colleges) to be followed transparently in all the selection processes. An indicative PBAS template proforma for direct recruitment and for Career Advancement Schemes (CAS) based on API based PBAS is annexed in          Appendix III. The universities may adopt the template proforma or may devise their own selfassessment cum performance appraisal forms for teachers.While adopting this, universities shall not change any of the categories or scores of the API given in Appendix-III.The universities can, if they wish so, increase the minimum required score or devise appropriate additional criteria for screening of candidates at any level of recruitment.”

4. The clause 7.3.0 of the Principal Regulations shall stand amended and be substituted by the following clause:-

7.3.0. VICE CHANCELLOR:

i. Persons of the highest level of competence, integrity, morals and institutional commitment are to be appointed as Vice-Chancellors. The Vice-Chancellor to be appointed should be a distinguished academician, with a minimum of ten years of experience as Professor in a University system or ten years of experience in an equivalent position in a reputed research and / or academic administrative organization.

ii. The selection of Vice Chancellor should be through proper identification of a panel of 3-5 names by a Search Committee through a public notification or nomination or a talent search process or in combination.

The members of the above Search Committee shall be persons of eminence in the sphere of higher education and shall not be connected in any manner with the university concerned or its colleges. While preparing the panel, the Search Committee must give proper weightage to academic excellence, exposure to the higher education system in the country and abroad, and adequate experience in academic and administrative governance to be given in writing along with the panel to be submitted to the Visitor/ Chancellor. The constitution of the Search Committee could be as per the Act/ Statutes of the concerned university.

iii. The Visitor/ Chancellor shall appoint the Vice Chancellor out of the Panel of names recommended by the Search Committee.

iv. The conditions of services of the Vice Chancellor shall be as prescribed in the Act/ Statutes of the university concerned in conformity with the Principal Regulations.

v. The term of office of the Vice Chancellor shall form part of the service period of the incumbent concerned making him/her eligible for all service related benefits.”

 

5. The Table I [Category I, II &III] of Appendix-III of the Principal Regulations shall stand amended and be substituted by Table I [Category I, II & III] appended to these amendment Regulations.

 

To:

The Manager, Government Press

(Akhilesh Gupta)

Secretary, UGC

Note

This News is with an attachment file.


Back